A Closer Look at Rajiv Malhotra

If you’re interested in learning more about Rajiv Malhotra, you’ve come to the right place. He’s an Indian born American author and Hindutva activist. He also runs a foundation focused on Indic studies. For example, his foundation is funding a Columbia University project to translate the Tibetan Buddhist text Tengyur.

rajiv malhotra’s books

One of the most controversial aspects of Rajiv Malhotra’s books is the claim that he plagiarized Western scholars and writers. This accusation is backed by several prominent scholars, including Richard Fox and Andrew J. Nicholson, who have both been critical of Malhotra’s work. Nevertheless, the two authors have not sided with each other and continue to defend the author’s right to free speech.

His writings often question the established order of academic knowledge and the power structures that are in place. While he has faced ridicule and hostility in the academy, he continues to push for an indigenous view of Indian history and identity formation in the subcontinent. He argues for a level playing field for Indian intellectual traditions and seeks to challenge the scholarly cartel that controls the academic establishment.

his social media presence

Rajiv Malhotra is a tech millionaire and Right-wing ideologue. He is an honorary professor at the prestigious Jawaharlal Nehru University in Delhi, one of the best liberal arts colleges in India. He was educated at Delhi’s St Stephen’s College and Syracuse University, and has a degree in computer science. He has a loyal following on Twitter and Facebook, and posts content that questions other religions and the Bharatiya Janata Party. His Twitter feed contains a lot of loaded reports that seem to polarize the views of those who follow him.

In a recent tweet, Malhotra posted a picture of 25 lakh temples in India and questioned why the Sabarimala controversy should concern intellectuals. While he has not verified this claim, it is difficult to ignore Malhotra’s history of writing and lecturing on the topic of anti-India content in Indian education. His appointment as an honorary professor at the Centre for Media Studies at JNU has also prompted criticism.

his book ‘Being Different’

‘Being Different’ is a classic, and it is bound to cause a stir, especially in the debate on interreligious tolerance. Its central themes are that diversity is important and that we need to respect others’ differences. This book argues that a pluralist, multi-civilizational society is the most effective way to create a more harmonious world.

The book begins by defining differences between Hinduism and Christianity, and it sets forth the spiritual differences between these two traditions. The author also attempts to translate Hindu jargon, which often involves concepts that do not have a linguistic equivalent. For example, “yogi” is not equivalent to “saint,” and “aum” is not equivalent to “amen.”

his book ‘Swadeshi Indology Conference’

The Swadeshi Indology Conference was an important historical event for India. It was organized by Prof KS Kannan of Jain University in Bangalore. The idea was to turn the western gaze back toward India with Bharatiya drishti and to rewrite the civilizational story of ancient India through the lenses of indigenous Indians.

Rajiv’s work is backed by a strong social media presence. His Facebook page has close to seven million followers. This demonstrates his passion for spreading his ideas.

his criticism of Indian-American donors for funding of South Asian Studies

Earlier this year, the Hindu-American donor Rajiv Malhotra published a book titled Breaking India. The book is a critical read of the Hindu nationalist and online ideologue’s recent criticism of South Asian Studies. The book includes criticisms of Sheldon Pollock, the chief editor of a Harvard Press series on South Asian studies. In response to the criticism, Pollock declined to comment.

The Indian-American donors who fund South Asian Studies, such as the Carnegie Foundation, should reevaluate their priorities and their impact on the field. First, instead of promoting “Indian” studies, the donors should focus on issues related to geopolitical development and technology. Such a focus could help them leverage Bharatiya’s reputation in American business schools and corporate America. It would also be wise to work with business schools and universities that have more experience evaluating business scholars.